| Post a Reply | Start New Message |
| Weblog: | Connect SAP R/3 4.6C and SharePoint 2003 - Part II: Define SAP Proxy | |
| Subject: | Good one, follow-up | |
| Date: | 2005-12-19 16:14:34 | |
| From: | Shannon Giacomo Business Card | |
 |
||
| Yes this is great information, thank you. Our company is also on 4.6C, installing a Sharepoint infrastructure and evaluating Enterprise Portals as well. I keep coming back to the question: why use two portals? My manager showed this in practice by linking a dynamic BW 3.5 web report (hosted on a Netweaver WAS 6.40) into our test Sharepoint team site, everything worked just fine except for the single sign-on which we haven't addressed but that should not be a big deal. So it seems to me that you only need ITS/WAS 6.20 for a version 4.6C or older system, or WAS 6.40 in the Netweaver world, then you could still use Sharepoint as the sole portal without ever installing Enterprise Portals? Any thoughts or ideas on direction from here? I just attended the Enterprise Portals seminar in Orlando and this seemed to be a valid approach, but am concerned that we are missing something by not implementing SAP Enterprise Portals? | ||
| |||||||||||||||
Previous Message
SAP, mySAP, mySAP.com, xApps, xApp, and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries all over the world. All other product, service names, trademarks and registered trademarks mentioned are the trademarks of their respective owners.